Tiens, ce n'est pas tout! La Maison Blanche veut maintenant contrôler les soldats de l'ONU. Sous prétexte que les USA sont les principaux financiers de la "neutre" ONU. ____ Pourquoi pas tant qu'à y être! Ça se comprend, avec 3000 soldats américains morts en Irak. ____ On voit carrément la tentative de mise en place d'une armée mondiale sous commandement du Chef Ultime Bush. Des heures de plaisir! ____ Voici un lien à ce sujet : ____ http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/11/3/01635/3250 _____ Peut-être qu'ainsi nous pourrons comprendre comment Hitler est arrivé au pouvoir, et peut-être que nous pourrons ainsi arrêter de dire que tout les Allemands étaient des nazis...car tous les Étasuniens ne sont pas derrière W... Nous vivons les mêmes événements qu'avant la Deuxièmes guerre (ce n'est PAS une exagération), mais aujourd'hui nous sommes au courant de ce qu'il se passe avec la TV, internet etc... On a l'information, on sait que W est dangereux et fou, mais... personne ne bouge... W se permet des trucs qui n'auraient pas passé il y a 60 ans, il se fout de la gueule de la planète entière avec le sourire devant tout les médias. ___ L'Histoire se répête. Breaking: Bush Wants Command Of UN Forces ___ by Patriot Daily News Clearinghouse Thu Nov 02, 2006 ___ This is all the world needs. Bush Team wants to place a US General in charge of ALL UN peacekeeping missions. This would essentially make Mr. Preemptive, Unilateral Decider the Commander In Chief of worldwide military missions with an extra 95,000 soldiers (or UN peacekeepers) to manage "trouble spots from Lebanon to Sudan." IT may also be Bush's exit strategy for Iraq and Afghanistan by replacing US troops with UN forces. Today, the NATO commander indicated that a victory in Afghanistan is not doable without more troops. _____ Bush Team is justifying its "right" to head worldwide military operations by citing US contributions to the UN. The US only contributes a fraction of the peacekeeping forces: 335 peacekeepers and 330 civilians out of 95,000 UN peacekeepers. However, the US cites that it pays 26% of the UN peacekeeping budget. ____ The seriousness of this proposal can not be underestimated. Under Bush's great commander-in-chief skills, the world now has conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan and wars which have worsened by his neglect in the Middle East and Africa. Taliban and insurgent republics are spreading throughout Iraq and Afghanistan because Bush failed to provide sufficient ground forces. The Iraq war is spreading into Iran, Turkey and Saudi Arabia while Bush is prepping Latin America with permanent military bases. Meanwhile, administration hawks are promoting a confrontational stance against Russia and China and advancing with plans to control space, which then brings India into the global space wars. In addition to seeking control over UN peacekeeping forces, Bush Team is working on a "parallel diplomatic track" to establish a coalition of nations to sanction Iran should the UN not cave to Bush's whims.____ Many seemed confidant that Bush could not accomplish his neocon plans to spread wars in Iran, Syria and elsewhere because the continuing Iraq and Afghanistan wars have wrecked our troop capability for new wars. Now we can see that Bush's answer is to get more cannon fodder not by a US draft, but by taking over 95,000 UN peacekeeping forces. Seems Bush actually has a 3-pronged plan for world peace: (1) Bully the heads of foreign countries to bow to his wishes, but if that does not work, (2) impose sanctions with a coalition working outside the UN and (3) be ready to deploy UN forces in combination with US troops and NATO. ____ Now, more so than ever before, world peace truly lies in the voters' hands.